Revisión literaria e histórica de medidas de complejidad de proyectos y desempeño de proyectos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37387/ipc.v9i1.217Keywords:
Project complexity, earned value, complexity index, schedule performance indexAbstract
This literary review seeks methodologies to measure the performance and complexity of projects, and to demonstrate the non-existence of a comparison between both measurements under the standard definition of performance. The difference between qualitative and holistic methodologies and those based on applied graph theory is established, and current variations and trends in project performance and success measurements are explored, leading us to reevaluate the investigated concepts’ definitions and appreciate the advantages that result from using methods based on applied graph theory. It is concluded that work schedules can, done properly, be used as a basis for measuring project complexity.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Investigación y Pensamiento Crítico
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. The Publications Service of the Universidad Católica Santa María La Antigua (the publisher) preserves the patrimonial rights (copyright) of the published works, and favors and allows their reuse.
2. The magazine (and its contents) use Creative Commons licenses, specifically the CC BY NC SA type, where: "the beneficiary of the license has the right to copy, distribute, display and represent the work and make derivative works provided you acknowledge and cite the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor." Abstract: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode
3. They can be copied, used, disseminated, transmitted and exhibited publicly, provided that: i) the authorship and the original source of its publication (magazine, publisher and URL, DOI of the work) are cited; ii) are not used for commercial purposes.
4. Conditions of self-archiving. Authors are encouraged to electronically disseminate the post-print versions (version evaluated and accepted for publication), as it favors their circulation and dissemination, increases their citation and reach among the academic community.
