José Enrique Rodó y William James, ¿Un contrapunto humanístico-filosófico americano?

Authors

  • IPC USMA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37387/ipc.v3i3.57

Keywords:

Pragmatism, Arielism, America, Transcultural dialogue

Abstract

This text deals with comparing two texts Ariel by the Uruguayan Jose Enrique Rodo (1900) and the Pragmatism (1907) by the American William James. Through these texts, which have not been compared before, are founded american intellectuals traditions that until today have continued to be influential among intellectuals. Especially James Pragmatism is articulated in a series of texts written by Pierce and Dewey that, unlike Arielism, which quickly sold out its possibilities of reception and reproduction, has continued to interest scholars and intellectuals from around the world. The purpose of this paper is to show that there are similarities between the two ways of thinking and pragmatism, so unknown and vilified in Spanish America for being apparently an ideology of Empire and the north, it is a perfect partner to initiate a transcultural dialogue in the continent.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Imagen revista IPC, volumen 3, número 3, año 2015

Downloads

Published

2015-12-10

How to Cite

USMA, I. (2015). José Enrique Rodó y William James, ¿Un contrapunto humanístico-filosófico americano?. Investigación Y Pensamiento Crítico, 3(3), 62–73. https://doi.org/10.37387/ipc.v3i3.57

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 3 (2015): Investigación y Pensamiento Crítico

Section

Articles

License

1. The Publications Service of the Universidad Católica Santa María La Antigua (the publisher) preserves the patrimonial rights (copyright) of the published works, and favors and allows their reuse.


2. The magazine (and its contents) use Creative Commons licenses, specifically the CC BY NC SA type, where: "the beneficiary of the license has the right to copy, distribute, display and represent the work and make derivative works provided you acknowledge and cite the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor." Abstract: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode


3. They can be copied, used, disseminated, transmitted and exhibited publicly, provided that: i) the authorship and the original source of its publication (magazine, publisher and URL, DOI of the work) are cited; ii) are not used for commercial purposes.

4. Conditions of self-archiving. Authors are encouraged to electronically disseminate the post-print versions (version evaluated and accepted for publication), as it favors their circulation and dissemination, increases their citation and reach among the academic community.